Peer Review Process

Journal of Mental Health and Well-Being in Counseling implements that each accepted manuscript will go through a review process by the editor and reviewers, using a double-blind peer review process, in which the reviewer does not know the identity of the author and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer.

Journal of Mental Health and Well-Being in Counseling implements policies Double-blind Blind review: every manuscript received will be sent to reviewers who registered in the Journal of Mental Health and Well-Being in Counseling. The review process lasts a maximum of up to 30 (thirty) days, with the allocation of time given to each reviewer to complete its review process being a maximum of ten (10) working days. If the partners designated bestari previously was not able to finish his review work within the time limit specified, then chairman of the editorial board will appoint a replacement to review the reviewer's manuscript.

In the review process, reviewers provide considerations relating to compatibility between the title, abstract, introduction, discussion (results), and conclusion. In addition, reviewer also give consideration to novelty, scientific impact and references used

Review Process:

1. Authors submits the manuscript
2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]
3. Double-blind peer review process
4. Editor Decision (Accept Submission, Revisions Required, Resubmit For Review, Decline Submission)
5. Confirmation to the authors

The final decision of article acceptance will be made by editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles, including the sequence of published articles, will be made by the Editor in Chief by considering the sequence of accepted dates and the geographical distribution of authors.